User Tools

Site Tools

You are here: start » rvkde » usage
Trace:
rvkde:usage

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
rvkde:usage [2008/08/19 04:09] – dirtyrvkde:usage [2008/08/19 04:21] (current) – dirty
Line 56: Line 56:
 Now we have a parameter combination derived from cross-validation. Now we have a parameter combination derived from cross-validation.
   * Use these parameters to predict __satimage.scale.t__.<code>   * Use these parameters to predict __satimage.scale.t__.<code>
-rvkde-0.2.3-final/rvkde --predict --classify --acc -v rvkde-0.2.3-final/satimage.scale -V rvkde-0.2.3-final/satimage.scale.t -a 1 -b 1 --ks 8 --kt 10+rvkde-0.2.3-final/rvkde --predict --classify --acc -v rvkde-0.2.3-final/satimage.scale -V rvkde-0.2.3-final/satimage.scale.t -a 1 -b 1 --ks 8 --kt 21
 </code> </code>
 Let's take a look at the command. Let's take a look at the command.
Line 64: Line 64:
  
   * The result looks like<code>   * The result looks like<code>
-[0.916] a=1 b=1 s=8 t=10... +[0.9175] a=1 b=1 s=8 t=21... 
-</code>It indicates that RVKDE can yield a accuracy of 0.916 under this parameter combination when using __satimage.scale__ to predict __satimage.scale.t__. +</code>It indicates that RVKDE can yield a accuracy of 0.9175 under this parameter combination when using __satimage.scale__ to predict __satimage.scale.t__.
- +
  
 ====== Train, validate, and then test ====== ====== Train, validate, and then test ======
 Another common procedure for parameter selection is to create an independent validation set.  For example, you can use __satimage.scale.tr__ and __satimage.scale.val__ to do parameter selection and see how good the parameters are when applying on __satimage.scale.t__. Another common procedure for parameter selection is to create an independent validation set.  For example, you can use __satimage.scale.tr__ and __satimage.scale.val__ to do parameter selection and see how good the parameters are when applying on __satimage.scale.t__.
   * Use __satimage.scale.tr__ (as training set) and __satimage.scale.val__ (as validation set) to select the parameters.<code>   * Use __satimage.scale.tr__ (as training set) and __satimage.scale.val__ (as validation set) to select the parameters.<code>
-rvkde-0.2.3-final/rvkde --predict --classify --acc -v rvkde-0.2.3-final/satimage.scale.tr -V rvkde-0.2.3-final/satimage.scale.val -a 1,5,1 -b 1,2,0.5 --ks 1,30,1 --kt 1,30,1+rvkde-0.2.3-final/rvkde --predict --classify --acc -v rvkde-0.2.3-final/satimage.scale.tr -V rvkde-0.2.3-final/satimage.scale.val -a 1 -b 1,2,0.5 --ks 1,30,1 --kt 1,30,1
 </code> </code>
   * The result looks like<code>   * The result looks like<code>
-[0.381232] a=1 b=1.5 s=17 t=10...+[0.913599] a=1 b=1 s=8 t=23...
 </code> </code>
-  * Predict set2 with the selected model.<code> +  * Predict __satimage.scale.t__ with the selected parameters.<code> 
-rvkde/rvkde --predict --classify --f-measure -v res/tr.x5 -V res/te.x5 -a 1 -b 1.5 --ks 17 --kt 10+rvkde-0.2.3-final/rvkde --predict --classify --acc -v rvkde-0.2.3-final/satimage.scale.tr -V rvkde-0.2.3-final/satimage.scale.t -a 1 -b 1 --ks 8 --kt 23
 </code> </code>
   * The result looks like<code>   * The result looks like<code>
-[0.365651] a=1 b=1.5 s=17 t=10... +[0.917] a=1 b=1 s=8 t=23... 
-</code>It seems that the model selected is better than the previous one. +</code>It reveals that RVKDE yields very close accuracies with these two parameter selection schemes.
- +
-====== Summary of RVKDE ====== +
-Until now, you know that RVKDE has four parameters (//alpha//, //beta//, //ks//, and //kt//).  rvkde is a sophisticated machine learning package which has built-in functionalities for cross-validation and parameter-enumeration.  We will see some other parameters of rvkde in future exercises.  Of course, you could check [[http://zoro.ee.ncku.edu.tw/mbincku/rvkde/|the homepage of rvkde]] if you want to learn these facilities now. +
- +
-In addition, you learn two common model selection procedures.  In this exercise, you must try to find the best model for prediction the whole dataset, that is, F-measures of both //te.x5// and //te.x10// are good using only //tr.x5//, //va.x5//, //tr.x10//, and //va.x10//.+
rvkde/usage.1219118960.txt.gz · Last modified: by dirty

Page Tools

Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: CC Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 International
CC Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 International Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki

Copyright © 2006-2014 MBI Lab. All rights reserved.

  • Service
  • DBD2BS: connecting a DNA-binding protein with its binding sites
  • E1DS: predicting catalytic sites based on 1-dimensional signatures
  • PRASA: an integrated web server that analyzes protein interaction types
  • Prote2s: predicting protein secondary structures
  • seeMotif: exploring and visualizing sequence motifs in 3D structures
  • MEDock: a docking web server for efficient prediction of protein-ligand binding sites
  • Protemot: predicting protein binding sites with automatically extracted geometrical templates
  • YGA: identifying distinct biological features between yeast gene sets
  • Database
  • AH-DB: collecting protein structure pairs before and after bindingan hot
  • YPA: collecting promoter features in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
  • Collaborative
  • iPDA: a integrated protein disorder analyzer
  • ProteDNA: Predictor of sequence-specific DNA-binding residues in transcription factors
  • MAGIIC-PRO: discovering functional long motifs that are interleaved by several large irregular gaps